{"kind":"insufficient-history","endpoint":{"endpoint_id":"ep_6b9c3faf87ebcfb8","label":"api.discoverdmc.cloud GET /md","resource":"https://api.discoverdmc.cloud/md","probe_url":"https://api.discoverdmc.cloud/md","method":"GET","rail":"x402","operator":"discoverdmc.cloud","self":false,"probe_policy":"daily","policy_reason":null,"cadence":"daily","cadence_statement":"Probed once a day, at an hour this endpoint keeps, so a reading is at most a day old and this record supports day-resolution survival and price-change — never intra-day health.","probe_class":"executed","probe_class_statement":"Executed probe: the request we sent was the operator's own published example, or the route takes no body. The response grades the endpoint.","facilitator_statement":null,"engagement_statement":null,"succeeds":null,"succeeds_statement":null},"current":{"observation_id":"obs_t20261008T024500Z-029","tick_id":"t20261008T024500Z","observed_at":"2026-10-08T02:46:14.608Z","outcome":"Quoted","sub_codes":[],"rule_id":"R14a","confidence":"definitive","http_status":402,"latency_total_ms":927,"quote":{"rail":"x402","x402_version":2,"scheme":"exact","network_caip2":"eip155:8453","network_native":"eip155:8453","amount_atomic":"2000","asset":"0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913","pay_to":"0x74d68013530407300dc0e9f99f99eefec202a6c7","max_timeout_s":300,"archived_not_published":["envelope_extensions","extensions","extra"]},"quote_fingerprint":"1ab61fd87c5d1054","response_schema_fingerprint":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","capture_sha256":"3f9280ccbf6f24b3e11d7923961c971d6e462db6e8fa1ccac3a413354a64e05c"},"reading_age":{"age_s":75116,"past_cadence_after_s":90000,"past_cadence":false,"statement":"This reading is 20.9 hours old, inside the 25.0-hour wall this endpoint's own cadence sets (the cadence, plus the width of the hour the collector places this row in). The cadence sentence beside this states what our clock commits to; this is that clock set against the reading it is printed beside."},"record_standing":{"rows_in_window":7,"observations":7,"filed_absences":0,"earliest_row_at":"2026-10-02T02:47:07.544Z","newest_row_at":"2026-10-08T02:46:14.608Z","newest_row_is_absence":false,"absence_sub_codes":[],"absences_from":null,"absences_to":null,"nothing_sent_in_window":false,"held_before_window_at":null,"statement":"Inside this window the record holds 7 row(s) for this endpoint — 7 observation(s) and 0 filed absence(s). The newest of them is an observation, dated 2026-10-08T02:46:14.608Z."},"counts":{"not_probed":0,"planned_by_its_own_clock":7,"unaccounted":0,"completeness_statement":"not_probed counts the FILED absences, and there are 0 of them in this window. It is not a completeness reading: a collection cycle that dies part-way through writes no row at all for any endpoint it had not yet reached, so a shortfall of that kind can never appear in it. planned_by_its_own_clock is what this endpoint's own cadence committed to between the earliest row in this window and the window's end: 7. The record holds 7 row(s) against that — every observation and every filed absence — leaving unaccounted 0: planned readings with no row of either kind. That count describes the record, not the endpoint, and it is anchored on a row the record holds rather than on the window's start, so a row minted part-way through the window cannot inflate it."},"held":{"observations":7,"first_observed_at":"2026-10-02T02:47:07.544Z","last_observed_at":"2026-10-08T02:46:14.608Z","days_held":5.9994},"archive":{"first_observed_at":"2026-10-02T02:47:07.544Z","last_observed_at":"2026-10-08T02:46:14.608Z","days_held":5.9994,"observations":7,"basis":"Every observation we hold of this endpoint, at ANY depth - not the window you asked for and not the tier you paid for. A free caller and a full-archive caller see the same number here, so our depth can be measured before it is bought. `Not probed` rows are excluded: those are our absence, never an observation of anyone."},"paid_verification":{"last_paid_at":"2026-10-07T03:37:39.257Z","selected":true,"stratum":"random-clean","panels":[{"panel_id":"2026-10-fresh","role":"fresh","stratum":"random-clean"}],"attempts":[{"attempted_at":"2026-10-07T03:37:39.257Z","outcome":"Settled and answered","paid_rubric_version":2,"receipt_sha256":"2f3adef67a9c6ab77b23960a4e803fda57e0e4ededd1f9f40402c1f31ac5124d","request_rule":"declared-example","chain":{"reading":"corroborated","transaction":"0xc1729d21a819e4ceff1016c2daef1955517bc0f9da57d766419f0b1acdd1f3b7","via":"settle-response","block_number":52277459,"block_time":"2026-10-07T03:37:45.000Z","read_at":"2026-10-08T11:02:31.127Z","receipt_sha256":"a186cbc0f03ab2e06f645fd9de90f3aee830dec98ab84983307028c74bb5ce70"}}],"basis":"Our instrument has paid this endpoint and graded what came back against a published rule. Each attempt above carries its date, its grade, the version of the rule that graded it, and the hash of the receipt we hold for it. 1 payment(s) above are corroborated on-chain: two independent Base nodes agree each moved the quoted amount from our payer to the address the endpoint quoted. It is on the October 2026 draw, one of the published panels this month's programme calls. As of 2026-10-07T15:00:15.698Z, our paid-delivery audit had run: 2310 attempt(s) against 758 endpoint(s) on the published list. For 1408 of them the settle response names a transaction, and for 58 a payment was sent and the settle response named none, so the settle response alone does not show whether those settled.","record_source":{"source":"bundled","written_at":null,"attempts_through":"2026-10-07T15:00:15.698Z","stale":false,"refused":"the copy that shipped with this site holds a payment the archive's projection has not folded yet","says":"This reading comes from the copy of the paid record that shipped with this site, because the copy that shipped with this site holds a payment the archive's projection has not folded yet. The copy is written at the same time as the record itself, so it is behind by whatever has been paid since this site was last released — it is not a claim that nothing has been."},"chain_source":{"source":"read","nodes":["https://mainnet.base.org","https://base.gateway.tenderly.co"],"written_at":"2026-10-08T11:02:33.450Z","read_through":"2026-10-08T11:02:31.127Z","counts":null,"refused":null,"says":"Each reading of Base beside this endpoint's attempts was taken from two independent nodes, named in this block, which agree on it; the readings run to 2026-10-08T11:02:31.127Z, and each names the transaction and block it read and the hash of the receipt that holds both nodes' answers."}},"delivery":{"shape":"inline","tier_days":7,"inline":{"from":"2026-10-01T23:38:10.727Z","to":"2026-10-08T23:38:10.727Z"},"bulk":null,"statement":"Everything this tier buys is in this answer. The rows, counts and coverage above cover 2026-10-01T23:38:10.727Z to 2026-10-08T23:38:10.727Z — the whole of 7 days. There is nothing to fetch separately."},"requested_days":7,"statement":"probe402 holds 7 observation(s) spanning 6.00 day(s), which cannot support a 7-day summary. Those 7 reading(s), and the absences counted beside them, are the whole of what this answer can honestly say; the newest of them is this answer's current reading.","satisfiable_from":"2026-10-09T02:47:07.544Z","answer_version":"0.1.0","series_breaks":[{"break_id":"brk_seedversion_20261008T024614608Z_202610011_202610081","kind":"seed-version","at":"2026-10-08T02:46:14.608Z","from":"2026-10-08T02:46:14.608Z","to":"2026-10-08T02:46:14.608Z","endpoint_ids":"all","detail":"seed_version changed 2026-10-01.1 -> 2026-10-08.1; the seed list changed between these observations, which by itself does not mean any one endpoint was probed differently","ref":"seed_version:2026-10-01.1->2026-10-08.1"}],"tier":{"name":"free","days":7,"price_usd":0},"window":{"from":"2026-10-01T23:38:10.727Z","to":"2026-10-08T23:38:10.727Z"},"non_affiliation":"probe402 measures every endpoint with the same published rubric, on the schedule published for it, into the same public record. A paid engagement changes nothing in the public record and is disclosed on the page it touches. Every claim here is a dated observation made from probe402's vantage, never a statement about what an endpoint is.","method_url":"https://probe402.com/method","read_integrity":{"observation_files_read":0,"unreadable_files":0,"unreadable_keys":[],"archive_depth_memo":{"status":"absent","reason":"the whole-population depth memo was not opened: this endpoint's own depth object answered","through_key":null,"files_memoized":0,"archive_prefix_checked":false},"archive_depth_projection":{"status":"used","reason":null,"through_key":"dataset/observations/2026-10-07/t20261007T234500Z.jsonl","written_at":"2026-10-08T02:05:00.000Z"},"window_projection":{"status":"used","reason":null,"through_key":"dataset/observations/2026-10-08/t20261008T233000Z.jsonl","covers_from":"2026-09-28T03:35:00.000Z","rows_supplied":7,"archive_prefix_checked":false},"current_projection":{"status":"used","reason":null,"joined":false},"read_mode":"projections-only","statement":"Every observation file this answer opened was read (0 file(s)). No row is missing from this answer because we could not read it. The archive depth came from this endpoint's own depth object — its fold over every closed day through dataset/observations/2026-10-07/t20261007T234500Z.jsonl, verified against its own hash — plus the rows after that file that the window projection holds; the whole-population depth memo was not opened. The 7 observation(s) of this endpoint recorded up to dataset/observations/2026-10-08/t20261008T233000Z.jsonl came from its own window projection, complete from 2026-09-28T03:35:00.000Z and verified against its own hash; only the files written after that point were opened. This answer was built on the DECISION PATH: no observation file was opened and dataset/observations was not listed, so this read does not grow with the archive's age. The accelerators above were checked for version, shape, the key they are filed under and their own hashes. The archive-PREFIX proof was NOT performed — that comparison needs a listing of the archive, and this read holds none. This endpoint's current-reading projection read used, and it supplied no row the window projection did not already hold."}}