How much of the MPP catalogue is mounted through a gateway?
Answered from the issue named below, as published on its date. A later issue is a later answer, at its own address.
The answer
109 of 142 listed services (76.8%) are third-party gateway mounts by the catalogue's own
integrationfield, and 978 of 1,456 endpoint rows (67.2%) are mounted through the gateway domains of Orthogonal, Locus and Tempo — a statement about how the catalogue is integrated, not about economic control.
(1) The CATALOGUE population: every route listed on the two public route catalogues, combined and de-duplicated, at one stamped read on 2026-09-01 — the read the issue's route, host and service counts are quoted against, with a second complete read 93 minutes later kept as the cross-check.
The sentence above is quoted from a published issue and is not re-written here. Its date, its population and the record behind it are below.
What this does not say
- The gateway split is a statement about how a catalogue is integrated, not about who controls the economics of the services in it.
The evidence
What ran, when, and the record it produced.
| What ran | When | Record |
|---|---|---|
| One fresh read of the second catalogue's service listing, split by that catalogue's own integration field: which services are mounted through a third party's gateway domain, and which are listed by the service itself. | 4c56c19a6605088f8cfdc3fca30095fe25ed46321f92b49d99e8c5e466133e71 |
- Sealed days behind the archive figures
- 11
- Observations in that window
- 29,022
- Issue
- Machine Commerce Reality Index: #001 — August 2026
- Published
The terms
The terms this question uses are defined in the glossary.
Corrections and disputes
This answer names a party we measure. The route to dispute a reading is on the corrections page.
Corrections to this issue are on the corrections register, and this answer reads from the record rather than from a copy.